web counter
LEXO PA REKLAMA!

SHKARKO APP

The media at Kinostudio and the gymnasium land for Carlo Bollino

2024-01-05 14:17:00, Editorial Elvi FUNDO
The media at Kinostudio and the gymnasium land for Carlo Bollino
Carlo Bollino

After the scandal related to the Partizani club, the arrest of Abi Malltez and the public positions held by well-known anti-Berisha journalists, or even those who are pro-Berisha, who oppose in pathos, between the two battles, the war of those who lie for the account of the government and the struggle of those who want to protect Berisha, there is a third way, with some details, which maybe SPAK, which is doing the investigations, and public opinion needs to understand the truth about how the history of cinema studio with the land where the Italian-Albanian citizen, Carlo Bollino, built his television.

In Kinostudio it is claimed that it was a converted property and partially known as Hysa family land, but that was not given and then the televisions were housed there.

The media at Kinostudio and the gymnasium land for Carlo Bollino
Kinostudio used to be

In fact, there is a difference with the ground that Carlo Bollino has taken since the beginning of the debate.

In Kinostudio there were buildings and institutions, which are not only the media, so it is not only "Klan" and "Ora News". Those buildings now house the Ministry of Culture, without the former big cinema, there used to be a private university like "Marubi", there was "Alba Filmi", ie another state institution, then "SKAN TV" was housed there. "ABC News", "Ora News", "Klan". There are some private radio stations, there are also other premises rented out to third parties.

The media at Kinostudio and the gymnasium land for Carlo Bollino
Carlo Bollino

So, the thesis that it was taken by "Klan" and "Ora News" and that's the story, is a lie. The Kinostudio premises have been used by many public entities, but also private businesses, leased by the state. It's a long list of them.

While in the case of the citizen Carlo Bollino and the taking of a state property forgiven by the private for gymnasium and making it available to a media, it is not the same. Let's not forget Carlo Bollino is also the beneficiary of millions and millions of euros from Albanian taxpayers through his claims as services he provides.

Moreover, the problem does not lie in the fact, that's why it was given to them up in Kinostudio and why not to Carlo below. This is a barren debate. This is a trail of Renaissance propaganda and their megaphones to debunk what has happened.

When a part of the state assets administered in Kinostudio was given to the media, then it was offered to "Klan" and "Top Channel" and Carlo, who in fact his previous television, "News 24", he had it housed again in public premises, at the former Tractor Plant, owned by the state, because Carlo Bollino's stories with public state property where he houses the media, do not begin with that area of ??the former Partizani club, which was donated by the land owners to build a gymnasium.

There is a big difference in this whole story, in Kinostudio the premises were offered as a solution, a large part of which were in use, but a part of which was unused, after their abandonment after the 90s for all media, not only Klan or Ora, but to accommodate "Top Channel", "Klan" and all other media, to be an area for all media. At that time, the only one that did not accept was "Top Channel".

Carlo Bollino, in relation to the land that is claimed, has a problem with a legal procedure followed, where the CNA has clarified, it is a land that the state did not offer like all the others or as in the case of Kinostidio where the media sheltered them endlessly, it is alleged that Carlo put his finger there and took this property.

This is where the discussion begins and ends, because just as many television, radio, media and other private or public persons have taken properties for the media at Kinostudio, Carlo Bollino could also go and there would be no problem.

The media at Kinostudio and the gymnasium land for Carlo Bollino
The television building that Bollino runs

As for the property that was taken by Carlo Bollino, there is a violation of legal procedures and it is claimed not only by citizens and family members or by politicians from the analysis of the facts through experts, it is suspected that from the procedure that was followed Carlo chose that property himself and moreover, a procedure was followed without a complete transparency, which comes from the scheme used to take the direction to Carlo Bollino.

This is the crux of the problem. In Kinostudio, not one was sheltered and was not chosen by anyone, but it was the government at the time that made a decision to shelter the media after they had problems and it was offered to everyone, while at Carlo a procedure was followed, in order for him to take that property, which was donated for the construction of a gymnasium by the former owners, this is the accusation.

This is quite a fundamental change. The debate is not that they took it up in Kinostudio and why not this one down here too.

No, the debate is that they took it by rules, by law, in the property of Kinostudio, which was given to use by all the media, not an individual, because here at Carlo Bollino's property, a procedure has been done for an individual and it is called clientelistic and in the service of the propaganda that the government wants, from the media, which it feeds not only with such properties./ CNA

 





14:47 Editorial REDAKSIONALE

The author of the photo

The public liar, Aldor Nini, tried to use an opposition me...

Lajmet e fundit nga