E fundit!

22:51 TODAY

Businessman Artur Shehu breaks his silence: I am a long-time land owner in Zvërnec, I don't know the investors at all

Albanian businessman Artur Shehu spoke on the Opinion show...

LSI-GSIS Agreement/Meta: Here are the questions that SPAK should address to the Department of Justice

2026-05-20 14:06:00, Politikë CNA

LSI-GSIS Agreement/Meta: Here are the questions that SPAK should address to the

The leader of the Freedom Party, Ilir Meta, has published on social networks several questions that, according to him, SPAK should address to the US Department of Justice regarding the GSIS company.

Meta writes that on June 23, 2026, the deadline imposed by a US court ends, which has ordered the GSIS company not to provide any information to LSI regarding services and payments made for two years.

According to the head of the PL, SPAK should request from the Department of Justice the original document terminating the agreement between LSI and GSIS, the work product, information about the work product and the contract.

Meta's reaction

The questions that have been missing for four years from the three SPAK prosecutors for the US Department of Justice.

On June 23, 2026, the deadline imposed by a US court, which ordered the GSIS company to refrain from providing any information to LSI for two years regarding the services and payments made between the two parties under the contract of February 3, 2016, registered in the US and Albania, in full respect of the anti-corruption laws of both countries, expires.
This decision came as a result of the request of the Albanian Ministry of Justice.
First, I would like to clarify that this decision has deliberately served only to prevent me from providing evidence that exonerates me from the charges, as well as from having the opportunity to verify the legality of the evidence alleged by the charges.
Therefore, in respect of the legal contract of February 3, 2016 between GSIS and LSI and the willingness expressed by the US authorities to provide all the detailed clarifications that will be required, we are assisting the three SPAK prosecutors with the questions that have been missing for four years that they should send to the US Department of Justice regarding this matter:
1- Based on the point of Termination of the Agreement, we want the original document of the termination of this Agreement to specify:
a) The date when these contractual relations were legally terminated;
b) The specific person from LSI who signed this Agreement.
2- If this agreement is confirmed to have been terminated, then according to the legal obligation, all the work product that GSIS has delivered to LSI from the first day until the day of the termination of the agreement must be in original.
3- Likewise, in this case, GSIS must submit all the confidential information that it has provided to LSI and all the confidential information that it has received from LSI.
This would help SPAK identify the responsible person in the LSI who received the information from GSIS or even the person who provided the confidential information of the LSI to the GSIS.
Because, as can be assumed, we are in the case of dealing with the same person or with two different persons who should be questioned by the prosecutors.
4- GSIS should be asked if any transfer or subcontracting of this Agreement has occurred and if so, who is the person who has given written consent under the contract from the LSI?
5- In the contract, at the end of the full Agreement it is specified that: “This Agreement may be amended or modified from time to time only by written agreement of both Parties signed by authorized representatives”.
Based on this point of the Agreement, has the Agreement been amended or modified? If so, the person from the LSI who signed it and the person who authorized this amendment should be urgently made available to SPAK to be interviewed.
6- Since SPAK has doubts that the American citizen A.SH may have made illegal payments in favor of LSI with income alleged from corruption in Albania on behalf of GSIS, please provide us with the written consent according to the contract in this case that he may have received from LSI and secondly the specific authorization that LSI is supposed to have given to A.SH.
7- If the contract has not changed, the original invoices that GSIS sent to LSI should be sent so that the specific person who received them according to the Agreement can be questioned.
8 – All payments made by LSI to GSIS should be sent in original, so that the specific persons can be questioned again.
There are many other questions, but these are the basics that should be conveyed to the American authorities about the GSIS company because only transparency can guarantee the legitimacy of the process.
If these questions are not addressed and this data is not obtained, then it is clear that the three SPAK prosecutors have never had an interest in uncovering the truth but have only served the political game, as was proven by the officially dismissed charge on November 15, 2024 for allegedly lobbying $1 million with the "McKeon Group" for the untaken photo with President Trump, information that was deliberately hidden from us until after the May 11, 2025 elections.