web counter
LEXO PA REKLAMA!

SHKARKO APP

App Store
Google Play

The Sadducee put the skin up for sale, but it seems no one bought it.

2026-05-06 11:46:00, Editorial CNA

The Sadducee put the skin up for sale, but it seems no one bought it.

The Supreme Court, for yesterday's "unifying" decision, took its cue from an appeal by the Prosecution against an arrest measure amended in the Appeals Court.

The appeal had changed "prison arrest" to "house arrest." The Supreme Court has had dozens of cases where it could have ruled to change the measure of "prison arrest."

He never did it! He left the prison arrest in effect as requested by the prosecution. This time it was invested for a case where the measure had been changed by the Appeal.

The President of the Supreme Court has never used the right to summon the Panels for any matter. Neither criminal, nor administrative (he calls himself a professor of Administration), nor civil.

Although the new system gives the Supreme Court the primary task of unifying judicial practices as much as possible, President Sadushi was never able to rise to the level required by the reform he himself cooked up.

It has not used the right to take the initiative for the unification of judicial practice in any other case.

He was inspired only by the case where the arrest warrant was changed on appeal and thought of unifying it according to his own administration.

The Supreme Court "clarified" with a decision how the law should be read and applied. It did not repeal any decision. It simply added 3 paragraphs to an existing decision.

The beautiful thing is that the decision was unanimous.

That is, even the part of the Criminal College of the Supreme Court that issued decisions contrary to the unanimous decision in the "Bektashi" case agreed with this decision.

Why did the need for unification arise when Sadushi was faced with the "Bektashi" case, especially when Bektashi's arrest order was changed by the Appeals Court?

The Supreme Court has massively upheld detention decisions.

It is hard to believe that none of the detainees who appealed their prison sentences, before the Appeals Chamber changed the sentence for Bektashi, had arguments in their favor.

But if that is the case, then in those cases where the Supreme Court has not changed the arrest decisions, we can say that both the lower courts and the Prosecutor's Office have acted correctly. Both the Prosecutor's Office and the lower courts have decided in accordance with this unification that Sadushi announced to us yesterday.

Sokol Sadushi no longer has time to use his right as chairman to summon the Colleges to unify practice on any other issue.

In his history as president of the Supreme Court, he will go down in history as the president who called the panels to resolve a case that had been resolved by the Court of Appeal.

He will also go down in history as the mayor who sold the sack of stock he had accumulated to the lower courts, as a stock sale. Respectively, even to his wife in the Administrative Court!

Because the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court also brags a lot about having reduced the stock.

But, in fact, the Supreme Court massively returns cases for reconsideration to lower courts.

It's like saying that a husband in the Supreme Court takes the work away from himself and adds it to his wife in the Administrative Appeals Court.

Ironically, Sadushi himself is an administrator!

This is the lecture that the Administration professor will explain to the students, demonstrating "concretely" how stock is reduced.

Now he just needs to find enough fools to believe he deserves to be President to widen the "hole" (that's what they call the hole on the sides of the Sadducee) that he made in the Supreme Court. /CNA





Lajmet e fundit nga