How the KPP was taken hostage by the IT tender duo

2025-11-16 13:06:39, Denoncim CNA

The Public Procurement Commission is the institution that is seen as the last step in the state pyramid for appealing in the public procurement process.

The head of this institution, Jonaid Myzyri, has been named as a defendant by SPAK and there are hundreds of cases of absurd decisions by this institution that end up in court, leading to blockages or economic consequences for institutions or economic operators.

SPAK takes the head of Public Procurement, Jonaid Myzyri, as a defendant
June 24, 12:55

CNA is further deepening the investigation regarding this institution and its misuse by certain segments and individuals.

We are bringing a case where the KPP has not only been misused, but with the successive steps and blockages that occurred due to incompetence, or ignorance, not excluding the suspicion that there may also be a corrupt affair at the foundation of the institution with major consequences for state institutions. The cases speak for themselves.

Investigation/How and who blocks IT procurements, from the Public Procurement Commission to embassies
October 7, 12:35

Let's give the example of how intentional blockages are made complaint after complaint, and this has already been proven.

After receiving the decision from the PPC, the Contracting Authority is obliged to issue an annex for the implementation of its decision within 5 days, and then the PPC to state whether or not it will lift the suspension. Cases when the PPC does not lift the suspensions are when the PPC decision has not been implemented by the Contracting Authority.

In many recently identified complaints (list below), before the KPP issues a decision on whether or not to lift the suspension of the Economic Operator, they file a new complaint and the KPP reviews it and accepts it.

How the KPP was taken hostage by the IT tender duo

There is a legal irregularity here, because the process should have been closed when the CPC expressed whether or not it was allowed to continue the procedure and further steps, not to continue with complaints after complaints. These maneuvers mean that the "game" of complaints never stops and the procedure is not carried out at all.

Behind them, in the shadows, lie the strong connections of deliberate complainers, where everything seems clear, that it must pass through their hands, otherwise there are no procedures, no IT tenders, only complaints and blockages.

IT Procurement/ Scenarios that go from Migena Schröder and Gerond Meçe to the weaknesses of ambassadors
October 8, 13:51

KPP TREND

The KPP has received 100% of the complaints of the operators led and managed by Migena Schröder and citizen Gerond Meçe.

This fact confirms for the umpteenth time what CNA has discovered that schemes are being used that lead to a total blockage of IT procedures, in order to ensure that they are controlled by certain hands.

The PPC must follow the rules and law on public procurement, guaranteeing the parties that the process is fair and transparent.

But the KPP creates even more blockades or tender favors that are requested by "ambassadors" who write e-mails to institutions, or suspicious forms of pressure with Mrs. Schröder's passport or anonymous letters passed by or from Gerond Meçe's leadership./ CNA