The woman with three minors is left without economic assistance/ The employee saw her by car and thinks that the divorce is fictitious!

2023-10-25 22:37:00, Denoncim CNA

The woman with three minors is left without economic assistance/ The employee

The show "Fiks Fare" brought the case of a divorced mother with three children, who does not receive economic assistance because the economic assistance worker saw her giving to the car.

Albina Ifthimiu, divorced since 2021, lives in her parents' house with her three children aged 8, 5 and 2.

And since the time she got divorced, she applied for economic assistance, but the employee declares that she is hiding her income, the house she has with her ex-husband and a car.

"The employee scolded me, she saw me give the car and told me that it is mine, I don't have a car, I live with my mother and when she checked, it turned out that I don't live in my ex-husband's house", says Albina.

In the recordings that Fiksi broadcasted, the economic aid worker, Evisa Pepa, tells him that she saw him giving the car. Also, even though she admits that during the verification, the mother with the three children turned out to be living with her mother, she thinks that Albina lives at her ex-husband's house. She even does not hesitate to raise doubts with the administrator of the Fier - Shegan Administrative Unit that the couple are not divorced even though they have a court decision.

Meanwhile, in the Lushnje Municipality and the Fier Regional Social Service, the citizen is told that the employee of the administrative unit does the data entry into the system.

Thus, the citizen cannot receive economic assistance because the employee thinks that she is hiding her income. Fiks reporters met the employee Pepa, who denies that the citizen has told her that she is a co-owner of her ex-husband, and insists that she often sees him by car around the village, so she does not receive economic assistance.

In the verifications, Albina does not turn out to be the owner of any vehicle and she told the employee that the car in which she was seen was one of her relatives, but the employee was shocked by her answer "I think it is yours and not your cousin's." borrow it several times that I have seen you". Even for the assumptions that the complainant can live in her ex-husband's house, the latter listed the reasons why she cannot live there, but which were not convincing for the employee.

She closes the sentence by saying that she complains above. While the employee thinks many things about the complainant, none of them are proven, except for the fact that Albina and her three children are excluded from the right to economic assistance and from applying for it for one year./ Tch