web counter
LEXO PA REKLAMA!

SHKARKO APP

App Store
Google Play

Klodiana Lala shows behind the scenes/ Here's what happened with the head of SPAK at the meeting for Balluk

2026-02-23 21:38:00, Aktualitet CNA

Klodiana Lala shows behind the scenes/ Here's what happened with the head

Journalist Klodiana Lala shared new details this evening regarding the meeting held today at the Mandates Council on the immunity of Deputy Prime Minister Belinda Ballukur, where the head of SPAK, Klodjan Braho, was also present.

Invited to the show "The Unexposed", Lala said that the meeting was held behind closed doors precisely because SPAK requested it.

Lala also focused on the arguments presented by Braho and the criminal offenses that were mentioned.

"The meeting of the Council for Mandates and Immunity was held behind closed doors, after SPAK requested this. The prosecutors claimed that it is a matter under investigation and there is a risk of damaging evidence and the investigation. They requested a closed-door meeting.

The term “35 years in prison” was used. Mr. Braho, presenting the arguments, stated that in the first moments, when the suspension from exercising functions for Balluku was requested and approved, the criminal offenses had a penalty margin of up to 10 years. But then the prosecutors claim that they have new evidence that has aggravated Balluku's positions, 9 episodes, the Llogara tunnel, 7 lots of the Ring Road and the Thumane-Kashar concession. The prosecutors have said hypothetically that he could be sentenced to up to 35 years. Mrs. Balluku's position has been significantly aggravated. So this was the context in which the prosecutors used the phrase 35 years in prison. 

Prosecutors, to support their request, have presented the argument that Balluku may interfere to destroy evidence. Second, there is a risk of witness intimidation. In this context, prosecutors have presented wiretaps, where Ms. Balluku's subordinates have spoken to each other, which raises suspicions that Ms. Balluku is using people with criminal records to intimidate witnesses. But there is no new criminal charge for witness intimidation.

Prosecutors claim to have secured evidence that, according to them, leads to reasonable suspicion that Balluku is intimidating witnesses.

There is no exponent of organized crime who has been wiretapped, but subordinates who have claimed to have been blackmailed by people with records. When prosecutors raise this claim, it is a very strong condition to convince the Parliament to grant authorization.

"Initially there were suspicions about an accusation, now there are several rumors and suspicions. There is also evidence from one of Balluk's subordinates, who claims that she carried out the tenders under the orders of Berber, she is a defendant, she claims that she was threatened to withdraw her testimony against Balluk", Lala declared. /CNA  





Lajmet e fundit nga