web counter
LEXO PA REKLAMA!

SHKARKO APP

App Store
Google Play

Veliaj's dismissal and comparison with the "Berisha" case/ Lawyer explains why they are not the same

2025-09-18 22:42:00, Aktualitet CNA

Veliaj's dismissal and comparison with the "Berisha" case/ Lawyer

Lawyer Besnik Muçi spoke on a television appearance about the dismissal of Erion Veliaj and the discussion of whether the absence for dismissal should be with or without reason.

Muçi said that in the case of the mayor, a quarterly absence is sufficient, the law does not specify with or without absence.

" There is a discussion among lawyers. In the case of the mayor, there is no need for the absences to be with reason or without reason. The law says three months, it does not say with or without reason. Unlike the mandate of the deputy, which is said to be absent from work for more than six months without reason. So where the legislator wants, he has made it clear. The law is clear. The interpretation is simple and clear, there is no comparison between the mandate of the deputy and the end of the mandate of the local elected official ," said the lawyer.

 

Referring to comparisons with the "Berisha" case, Muçi said that there is no point in comparing Veliaj's case with that of the leading democrat.

The lawyer said that the comparison is inappropriate, because the constitutional provision for the mandate of a deputy is different from the law on local government.

" The comparison you made has no place, because the constitutional provision is for the mandate of the deputy. While the law on local government does not require absence with or without reason, it says failure to appear for duty. The comparison has no place, even when a constitutional and legal analysis is made. There is no place for comparison," said the lawyer./CNA





Lajmet e fundit nga