Prediabetic fraud/What to watch out for?

2026-02-18 15:36:00, Shëndeti Altin Joka

In 2001, the world was in dire need of a new chronic condition requiring treatment... this was the result of a meeting of several pharmaceutical companies...

So methods had to be found to include groups close to the recommended limits in the medication system.

Doctors were reluctant to treat these conditions, and patients were not sufficiently concerned about them. A section of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) met over lunch to find a suitable, if daunting, solution.

The product of the ideas was “Prediabetes.” It excited them so much that right after lunch they “… eliminated ‘impaired fasting glucose’ and ‘impaired glucose tolerance’ and replaced it with ‘prediabetes’ throughout our literature,” as Richard Kahn, then the ADA’s chief scientific and medical officer, recalled.

Now what does the ADA have to do with industry? Was this global association supposed to protect people's health?

While the ADA is a non-profit organization, its main funders are drug companies:

Abbott, Bayer, Roche, Lilly, Novo Nordisk and Sanofi each donate more than 1 million USD per year, and Merck and Xeris more than 500 thousand.

Influenced by the industry? How can you think that?!

Well, maybe because seven of the 14 experts and doctors who wrote the ADA's 2018 standards of care for 'prediabetes' received more money from the industry than many diabetics receive salaries from their employers:

$41,000 to $6.8 million between mid-2013 and 2017 from manufacturers of diabetes devices or drug candidates.

Payments covered consulting, travel, and research and included an average of $276,000 in personal fees. These standards of care recommend that physicians consider prescribing drugs such as pioglitazone, exenatide, and liraglutide, the latter two of which are (expensive) GLP-1 receptor agonists like Ozempic/Semaglutide.

The name prediabetes suggests that it leads to diabetes, but the idea that blood sugar levels will inevitably rise is not supported by scientific evidence.

A Cochrane review investigated the possibility of progression from intermediate prediabetic hyperglycemia to diabetes.

One of the findings of their 457-page meta-analysis summarizes data from 103 studies.

As seen in studies, more than 40% of prediabetics returned to normal blood sugar status, without any medication.

Less than 30% of pre-diabetics progressed to diabetes, but not enough to be called diabetic according to the cutoff of the analysis.

This means, seven out of every ten people diagnosed as prediabetic will NOT develop DIABETES over the next 10 years.

So friends, the PREDIABETES you hear about everywhere does not exist, and it does not even need any intervention. Everywhere I am asked about the tests that show me that they are close to the border and the doctors tell them "you are PREDIABETES". This is pure deception to start and prepare to take medication.

On the other hand, supplement companies are pressuring and trying to lobby the FDA to get a seal of approval for PREDIABETICS supplements.

So be careful, you can fall for the drug strategy of drugs that seeks at all costs, through doctors, to impose medication on you and convince you that you are PREDIABECTIC. This is a scam...